The Controversial UNO Rule No One Saw Coming; Check If You Playing It Right?
The Controversial UNO Rule No One Saw Coming; Check If You Playing It Right?
In a post, the UNO account addressed a common tactic employed by players: stacking +2 and +4 cards. The official word from UNO is crystal clear - it’s a no-go.

As the holiday season approaches and families gear up for festive gatherings, one age-old tradition is set to take centre stage – UNO. A staple in households around the globe, UNO has become synonymous with family fun, laughter and, let’s face it, a fair share of friendly disputes. With each passing year, the debate over UNO rules reemerges, prompting the game’s official account on the microblogging platform X to step in and settle the score.

UNO, known for its simple yet addictive gameplay, has long been a subject of contention when it comes to house rules. However, the game’s official X account has already laid down the law and clarified some of the most hotly debated issues surrounding its rules.

In a post, the UNO account addressed a common tactic employed by players: stacking +2 and +4 cards. The official word from UNO is crystal clear – it’s a no-go.

“If someone puts down a +4 card, you must draw 4, and your turn is skipped. You can’t put down a +2 to make the next person draw 6. We know you’ve tried it,” declared the UNO account.

This revelation has sparked a flurry of responses and inquiries from eager players seeking clarification on other scenarios. Social media users bombarded UNO with questions, eager to settle long-standing debates within their own game nights.

One user sought clarification on the possibility of stacking +4 cards on top of each other. UNO responded with a firm “NO.”

Another asked about stacking Draw 4 cards, to which UNO reiterated, “No, you cannot stack to make the following player draw 8 cards.”

Another participant inquired, “Wait, what about +2 on a +2??? Is that allowed?” UNO promptly responded, “No, you can’t stack cards.”

In a subsequent query, a player posed the scenario of playing a Draw 4, followed by the next player also playing a Draw 4, suggesting that the subsequent player should pick up a total of 8 cards. UNO dismissed this notion, asserting, “No, that is stacking! If someone plays a Draw 4, the next person draws 4 cards and their turn is skipped. The following person may play another Draw 4, if they wish.”

However, one query brought a twist to the discussion. A user asked UNO about stacking +2 or +4 cards when a player is skipped. To the surprise of the user, UNO approved it by saying, “YES! Someone gets it!”

However, when a user probed whether the penalty could be cumulative, such as the 3rd player playing a +2 on top of another +2, resulting in the next player drawing four cards and skipping their turn.

UNO clarified, “No, that’s stacking! You can’t add up the draw of 2 cards for someone to draw 4 cards.”

What's your reaction?

Comments

https://rawisda.com/assets/images/user-avatar-s.jpg

0 comment

Write the first comment for this!